BlueCat Motors E-books > Mathematics > Computer Network Security: Third International Workshop on by Naranker Dulay, Emil Lupu, Morris Sloman, Joe Sventek, Nagwa

Computer Network Security: Third International Workshop on by Naranker Dulay, Emil Lupu, Morris Sloman, Joe Sventek, Nagwa

By Naranker Dulay, Emil Lupu, Morris Sloman, Joe Sventek, Nagwa Badr, Stephen Heeps (auth.), Vladimir Gorodetsky, Igor Kotenko, Victor Skormin (eds.)

This quantity includes papers awarded on the third overseas Workshop on Mathematical tools, types and Architectures for laptop community - curity (MMM-ACNS 2005) held in St. Petersburg, Russia, in the course of September 25–27, 2005. The workshop used to be geared up through the St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of Sciences (SPIIRAS) in cooperation with Binghamton collage (SUNY, USA). the first and the 2d foreign Workshops on Mathematical equipment, versions and Architectures for machine community protection (MMM-ACNS 2001 and MMM-ACNS 2003), hosted through the St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation, confirmed the willing curiosity of the foreign examine group within the topic region. It was once well-known that engaging in a biannual sequence of such workshops in St. Petersburg stimulates fruitful exchanges among the di?erent faculties of idea, enables the dissemination of recent rules and promotesthespiritofcooperationbetweenresearchersontheinternationalscale. MMM-ACNS 2005 supplied a global discussion board for sharing unique - seek effects and alertness reviews between experts in primary and utilized difficulties of computing device community protection. a massive contrast of the workshop was once its specialise in mathematical points of data and laptop community protection addressing the ever-increasing calls for for safe computing and hugely liable computing device networks.

Show description

Read Online or Download Computer Network Security: Third International Workshop on Mathematical Methods, Models, and Architectures for Computer Network Security, MMM-ACNS 2005, St. Petersburg, Russia, September 24-28, 2005. Proceedings PDF

Similar mathematics books

Mechanical System Dynamics

This textbook provides a transparent and thorough presentation of the basic ideas of mechanical structures and their dynamics. It offers either the idea and purposes of mechanical structures in an intermediate theoretical point, starting from the fundamental recommendations of mechanics, constraint and multibody platforms over dynamics of hydraulic structures and gear transmission platforms to laptop dynamics and robotics.

Extra resources for Computer Network Security: Third International Workshop on Mathematical Methods, Models, and Architectures for Computer Network Security, MMM-ACNS 2005, St. Petersburg, Russia, September 24-28, 2005. Proceedings

Example text

This simple example shows that if the monotonic approximation has no reachable goal state, then the original system has no reachable goal state. 2 Nonmonotonicity Let us assume that T = (A, ∆, s0 , SG ) is a state transition rule-system and ∆ = computeNRS(∆) the noninterfering rule subset of T . Figure 5 presents Rule-Based Topological Vulnerability Analysis 33 an algorithm (TVA()) that returns a successful attack path if one exists. TVA takes a partial reverse attack path σ as an argument, together with ∆ and ∆ .

Am }, B = {b1 , . . , bn }, C = {c1 , . . , cj }, and D = {d1 , . . , dk }, and consider the transition relation δ(A, B, C, D) ∈ S × S given by: δ(A, B, C, D) = {(s, s ) | (s, s ∈ S) ∧ (A ⊆ s) ∧ (B ∩ s = ∅) ∧ (s = (s ∪ C) − D)} Informally, the transition rule δ(A, B, C, D) applies to states that contain the attributes in A and do not contain the attributes in B; the rule transforms a state by adding the attributes in C and deleting the attributes in D. We represent δ(A, B, C, D) by the transition rule: a1 , .

Then the (finite) set of all atoms, G, is defined as follows: all constants in K are in G; further, if p ∈ P has arity n and if k1 , . . , kn ∈ K then p(k1 , . . , kn ) ∈ G. Finally, the set of all attributes is A ⊆ G and the set of all states is S = 2A . 26 V. Swarup, S. Jajodia, and J. Pamula For instance, we use the attribute reachable(s, d, p) (where s, d, and p are constant strings) to denote that network packets that match pattern p can traverse the network from source IP address s to destination IP address d.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.51 of 5 – based on 11 votes